Not to Flip/Flop*,
but here is to NorMan GoldMan!
*Mitt Flop will be reserved for political righteousness.
===============
1-18-13 GPS -/- Update.
Tetrahedron
Files
#m-3M d'CAP[!]
C-Labels -/- (fn) Football Fields[!]
NGRS-ground zero{?}.../... Progressive Media, Local
- - -
PAGES -> FC, TBA, Nav(t), Ch, Fn, Labs, UpD, INET, PM, DA{?}
LOL, list original list. (FC) tba/Nav(t),Fn.
REVIEW {ow!?} (fn) ..\.. 94.9 Pop Culturalist? i/o crowd!(Swift/what?)
- - - \ - - -
Tobalowski / De-Frackology / NPR- interface / Rings & Armstrong
(b.s.) Golden Mean ... -> Tetra
Heed Ron , Running on
What? Rhetorical Slipperiness.
& borg -> Culture
War , Google
Works... , Way,
Too Point Oh? , Technical
Difficulties
Bran Ding[?]
\ - \
Showing posts with label Norman Goldman Radio Show. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Norman Goldman Radio Show. Show all posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Thursday, January 03, 2013
Clog Alert!
Not to Ribble, but regarding two points here:
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
The tenor of Bane Or.
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)
A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.
Further parse N later ... [^]
^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ? w h ?
[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat" RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn? i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*
^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
CBS AM 1090 Seattle: Get it while you can.
CBS drops talk for sports.
[CBS's AM1090 Converting to Sports Talk]**
This very disappointing** news came to me via the Norman Goldman Show.
Others who will need relocation:
* Randi Rhodes(6-9pm)
Mike Malloy(9pm-12am)
Stephanie Miller(6-9am)
Thom Hartmann(9am-12pm) KBCS(91.3)FM
Ed Schultz(12-3pm)
*(presented in order from time of this news)
(Norman is 3-6pm)
**[12-20-12(dual use asterisk/edit)sadness, panic, (add)embarrassment to have missed it. But nail' d, This.]
[CBS's AM1090 Converting to Sports Talk]**
This very disappointing** news came to me via the Norman Goldman Show.
Others who will need relocation:
* Randi Rhodes(6-9pm)
Mike Malloy(9pm-12am)
Stephanie Miller(6-9am)
Thom Hartmann(9am-12pm) KBCS(91.3)FM
Ed Schultz(12-3pm)
*(presented in order from time of this news)
(Norman is 3-6pm)
**[12-20-12(dual use asterisk/edit)sadness, panic, (add)embarrassment to have missed it. But nail' d, This.]
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!!!
After a semi-labor lockout**(I am being facetious),
what with my technical TOS (Transition of* Sorts),
I am grateful to be on.
* anachronistic caution
Dearly departed Android "3G-po" may he/she Rest in Peaces.
** sabbatical of sorts
(fn) in progress!
11-22-12 [C-VC]
what with my technical TOS (Transition of* Sorts),
I am grateful to be on.
* anachronistic caution
Dearly departed Android "3G-po" may he/she Rest in Peaces.
** sabbatical of sorts
(fn) in progress!
11-22-12 [C-VC]
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Post Election
88 Keys !
That is 44 x* 2 ?
The energy was amazing!
Now for cracking the code, or my Maddowian reference**(knock on wood), but I will leave it to Paul Harvey. The rest of the story. There is Romnesia and there is the Arithmatic.
Something Too Point Oh? Or Owe? Two out of three be bad branches.
Speaking of Maddow and the gang(Ed, Al, Lawrence, etc) I can only weave so much ! ***
* arrived late, left early, but got a pic with Norm, won a book, and booked.
** it was noisy, I fumbled my words, but we R R now Beyond the Norm.
*** doe$ that dog hunt? (I had to parse my inserts carefully[!])
[Conn, Kennedy, Bane Or(Tan Gent)]
[Bottom Line: Mr. President! Begin with your budget^ and your jobs bill on the table, before any grand B.S. ]
^ You know, the one that Romney said was part of everything that you had your way.
11-9-12 (update) Xfinity #9
11-22-12 [C-VC]
12-7-12 update: [listening to AM1090 online,
the following pic scrolled by as the 1st of 5 from 88Keys.
FYI, later scroll expanded to 240 or so pics.]
That is 44 x* 2 ?
The energy was amazing!
Now for cracking the code, or my Maddowian reference**(knock on wood), but I will leave it to Paul Harvey. The rest of the story. There is Romnesia and there is the Arithmatic.
Something Too Point Oh? Or Owe? Two out of three be bad branches.
Speaking of Maddow and the gang(Ed, Al, Lawrence, etc) I can only weave so much ! ***
* arrived late, left early, but got a pic with Norm, won a book, and booked.
** it was noisy, I fumbled my words, but we R R now Beyond the Norm.
*** doe$ that dog hunt? (I had to parse my inserts carefully[!])
[Conn, Kennedy, Bane Or(Tan Gent)]
[Bottom Line: Mr. President! Begin with your budget^ and your jobs bill on the table, before any grand B.S. ]
^ You know, the one that Romney said was part of everything that you had your way.
11-9-12 (update) Xfinity #9
11-22-12 [C-VC]
12-7-12 update: [listening to AM1090 online,
the following pic scrolled by as the 1st of 5 from 88Keys.
FYI, later scroll expanded to 240 or so pics.]
Friday, October 19, 2012
Clear Eyes,
Full Hearts, Can't Use* ?
It is unclear what the Romney ticket is going with, Mo'better Bush or Mo'better Obama, but certainly not No Drama Either or is it ether? Somewhere the Romney/Ryan/RNC use of the term quarterback escapes me. Even if it was just me, I think that Monday morning or anyday other day than game day is their style.
* was going to go with caffeinated but that was too Mormoney.
(Tagg we are it ?)
Replacement Refs or Not... (Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... ** )
===============
10-18-12
RETRO_SEG_WAY?
UNCLE SAM KNOT?
Or Fair and Balanced, not ? !
Or Just US!
=========
** updated, Thom Hartmann(Bu'), Norman Goldman(Dump), Randi Rhodes ('ump) (Bu' dump 'ump)/Re:tale.
Re:R,R,R A - R(not exactly) (j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r )
Not to Dump on Norman Goldman(nor Republicans), he is describing RepubliCONS as smart and fighting like cats and dogs over congress, while compromise is only for the president as candidate. He makes further cracks about the difficulties of Bozo John Boehner as House Speaker in hurding*** them. (my paraphrasing & rhetorical metamorphing.)
*** circular firing rhetorical metaphors(cats and dogs)
(Obama has a better record given his opposition, Romney had to cooperated with a 78% Democratic legislature which has the power.***) Yeah that asterisk is redundant... who needs Republicans when ... democracy is all over the map?)
[Bin Go ! Who let the names out? Con $(c)ent Ration ? (C S c R !) ]
It is unclear what the Romney ticket is going with, Mo'better Bush or Mo'better Obama, but certainly not No Drama Either or is it ether? Somewhere the Romney/Ryan/RNC use of the term quarterback escapes me. Even if it was just me, I think that Monday morning or anyday other day than game day is their style.
* was going to go with caffeinated but that was too Mormoney.
(Tagg we are it ?)
Replacement Refs or Not... (Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... ** )
===============
10-18-12
RETRO_SEG_WAY?
UNCLE SAM KNOT?
Or Fair and Balanced, not ? !
Or Just US!
=========
** updated, Thom Hartmann(Bu'), Norman Goldman(Dump), Randi Rhodes ('ump) (Bu' dump 'ump)/Re:tale.
Re:R,R,R A - R(not exactly) (j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r )
Not to Dump on Norman Goldman(nor Republicans), he is describing RepubliCONS as smart and fighting like cats and dogs over congress, while compromise is only for the president as candidate. He makes further cracks about the difficulties of Bozo John Boehner as House Speaker in hurding*** them. (my paraphrasing & rhetorical metamorphing.)
*** circular firing rhetorical metaphors(cats and dogs)
(Obama has a better record given his opposition, Romney had to cooperated with a 78% Democratic legislature which has the power.***) Yeah that asterisk is redundant... who needs Republicans when ... democracy is all over the map?)
[Bin Go ! Who let the names out? Con $(c)ent Ration ? (C S c R !) ]
Friday, October 05, 2012
Replacement Refs or Not...
If it were a debate* we would have stopped it.
Not to pun on Xfinity, but while the Comcast links*** will expire.**,
it's the congress John! Bring it on, Joe! The President needs to hold a Sit Down.
Before I get down to the task of preserving<*> those links whether read or not, I will explain the Rogue John and Wax Leak of the asterisks. Although the lesson learned from "Simon says"^^ might be to actually read links more thoroughly, the lesson from the Debate may be more complex but parallel of sorts. By "rogue",<*> I mean that former Presidential Candidate McCain(first link) confesses an expectation for him lowering the expectations of Paul Ryan, while disrespecting the Vice President and framing an expectation for gaffs. Then in regard to the " ball of wax " that Palin leaks, it connects the "boys" to the other "race" speech.^^^ (There, that's the GPS-uncross-Rhodes.)
And a far as my Tan Gents(Dr. Trumps), being a Seahawk fan has nothing to do with my take on the moderator. Well, who knows? But Mr. Lerrer has been critcized for not moderating or having a good performance, but I think that given the style over substance versus substance with style, these are not legitimate debates. And within the political system (such as it is) it was not his job to interfere with the players being themselves in order to let them make the proper contrast. Again having only heard most of the debate on the radio, I thought that the President walked away with it, but that was under the condition that facts matter. Neither he nor Lehrer could have done a better job in the case that they don't.
BTW^: Speaking of "boys", we have heard cracks about the Harvard "professor" and I suspect he has had to deal with a few wise-guys or gulls[!]
*if the link were fact checked...ditto.
(McCain goes rogue.)(Palin leaks ball of wax .)
** not that I have read them yet or the recommend them.
***The point of this lede and the heading...
^ apologies to literary geeks for my style over elements.(But that was Core Knell.)
^^ added in edit mode
^^^ to be expanded later(but see lede and stupid...I mean congress and John, Joe & Ryan. i.e. the context of the politics of "relief' legislation.)
[In the spirit of medium...? ]
[Not to parse too acutely, but it is the medium and the mess age.]
(Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... )
Re:Ouch?(see FLASHNOTE)
Post-Subjectivism? Might it be, rational subjectivism?
<*> 10-7-12(See FLASHNOTE: under construction)
<*> 10-9-12 slight edit ( "r.... ",)
Not to pun on Xfinity, but while the Comcast links*** will expire.**,
it's the congress John! Bring it on, Joe! The President needs to hold a Sit Down.
Before I get down to the task of preserving<*> those links whether read or not, I will explain the Rogue John and Wax Leak of the asterisks. Although the lesson learned from "Simon says"^^ might be to actually read links more thoroughly, the lesson from the Debate may be more complex but parallel of sorts. By "rogue",<*> I mean that former Presidential Candidate McCain(first link) confesses an expectation for him lowering the expectations of Paul Ryan, while disrespecting the Vice President and framing an expectation for gaffs. Then in regard to the " ball of wax " that Palin leaks, it connects the "boys" to the other "race" speech.^^^ (There, that's the GPS-uncross-Rhodes.)
And a far as my Tan Gents(Dr. Trumps), being a Seahawk fan has nothing to do with my take on the moderator. Well, who knows? But Mr. Lerrer has been critcized for not moderating or having a good performance, but I think that given the style over substance versus substance with style, these are not legitimate debates. And within the political system (such as it is) it was not his job to interfere with the players being themselves in order to let them make the proper contrast. Again having only heard most of the debate on the radio, I thought that the President walked away with it, but that was under the condition that facts matter. Neither he nor Lehrer could have done a better job in the case that they don't.
BTW^: Speaking of "boys", we have heard cracks about the Harvard "professor" and I suspect he has had to deal with a few wise-guys or gulls[!]
*if the link were fact checked...ditto.
(McCain goes rogue.)(Palin leaks ball of wax .)
** not that I have read them yet or the recommend them.
***The point of this lede and the heading...
^ apologies to literary geeks for my style over elements.(But that was Core Knell.)
^^ added in edit mode
^^^ to be expanded later(but see lede and stupid...I mean congress and John, Joe & Ryan. i.e. the context of the politics of "relief' legislation.)
[In the spirit of medium...? ]
[Not to parse too acutely, but it is the medium and the mess age.]
(Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... )
Re:Ouch?(see FLASHNOTE)
Post-Subjectivism? Might it be, rational subjectivism?
<*> 10-7-12(See FLASHNOTE: under construction)
<*> 10-9-12 slight edit ( "r.... ",)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)